You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rapid diagnostic test supply chain and consumption study in Cabo Delgado, Mozambique: estimating stock shortages and identifying drivers of stock-outs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-13-295 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leah Hasselback, Jessica Crawford, Timoteo Chaluco, Sharanya Rajagopal, Wendy Prosser, Noel Watson |
Abstract |
Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are particularly useful in low-resource settings where follow-through on traditional laboratory diagnosis is challenging or lacking. The availability of these tests depends on supply chain processes within the distribution system. In Mozambique, stock-outs of malaria RDTs are fairly common at health facilities. A longitudinal cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate drivers of stock shortages in the Cabo Delgado province. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 91 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 22% |
Researcher | 11 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 27 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 32 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,027,070
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#155
of 5,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,097
of 229,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#2
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.