↓ Skip to main content

Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low- and middle-income countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Managerial supervision to improve primary health care in low- and middle-income countries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006413.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xavier Bosch-Capblanch, Sajil Liaqat, Paul Garner

Abstract

Primary healthcare (PHC) workers often work alone or in isolation. Healthcare managerial supervision is recommended to help assure quality; but this requires skilled supervisors and takes time and resources. It is therefore important to assess to what extent supervision is beneficial and the ways in which it can be implemented.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 242 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 22%
Researcher 47 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 57 22%
Unknown 24 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 19%
Social Sciences 39 15%
Psychology 9 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 3%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 33 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,403,284
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,704
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,016
of 90,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.