You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Promoting latrine construction and use in rural villages practicing open defecation: process evaluation in connection with a randomised controlled trial in Orissa, India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-7-486 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophie Boisson, Peppin Sosai, Shubajyoti Ray, Parimita Routray, Belen Torondel, Wolf-Peter Schmidt, Bishakha Bhanja, Thomas Clasen |
| Abstract |
Our group conducted a cluster-randomised trial in 100 villages of Orissa, India to measure the impact of a rural sanitation intervention implemented under the government of India's Total Sanitation Campaign, on diarrhoea and soil-transmitted helminth infections. This paper reports on a process evaluation conducted in the context of the trial. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| India | 2 | 29% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 224 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 23% |
| Researcher | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 54 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 8% |
| Engineering | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 16% |
| Unknown | 66 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,881,868
of 23,804,762 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#226
of 4,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,459
of 231,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#13
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,804,762 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.