You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Endophytic bacterial community of grapevine leaves influenced by sampling date and phytoplasma infection process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Microbiology, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2180-14-198 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniela Bulgari, Paola Casati, Fabio Quaglino, Piero A Bianco |
| Abstract |
Endophytic bacteria benefit host plant directly or indirectly, e.g. by biocontrol of the pathogens. Up to now, their interactions with the host and with other microorganisms are poorly understood. Consequently, a crucial step for improving the knowledge of those relationships is to determine if pathogens or plant growing season influence endophytic bacterial diversity and dynamic. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2016.
All research outputs
#13,178,008
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#1,204
of 3,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,369
of 228,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#15
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,184 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.