↓ Skip to main content

Breast-Cancer Risk in Families with Mutations in PALB2

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
396 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
459 Mendeley
Title
Breast-Cancer Risk in Families with Mutations in PALB2
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, August 2014
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1400382
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonis C. Antoniou, Silvia Casadei, Tuomas Heikkinen, Daniel Barrowdale, Katri Pylkäs, Jonathan Roberts, Andrew Lee, Deepak Subramanian, Kim De Leeneer, Florentia Fostira, Eva Tomiak, Susan L. Neuhausen, Zhi L. Teo, Sofia Khan, Kristiina Aittomäki, Jukka S. Moilanen, Clare Turnbull, Sheila Seal, Arto Mannermaa, Anne Kallioniemi, Geoffrey J. Lindeman, Saundra S. Buys, Irene L. Andrulis, Paolo Radice, Carlo Tondini, Siranoush Manoukian, Amanda E. Toland, Penelope Miron, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Susan M. Domchek, Bruce Poppe, Kathleen B.M. Claes, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Patrick Concannon, Jonine L. Bernstein, Paul A. James, Douglas F. Easton, David E. Goldgar, John L. Hopper, Nazneen Rahman, Paolo Peterlongo, Heli Nevanlinna, Mary-Claire King, Fergus J. Couch, Melissa C. Southey, Robert Winqvist, William D. Foulkes, Marc Tischkowitz

Abstract

Germline loss-of-function mutations in PALB2 are known to confer a predisposition to breast cancer. However, the lifetime risk of breast cancer that is conferred by such mutations remains unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 241 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 459 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 444 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 99 22%
Researcher 75 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 13%
Other 50 11%
Student > Bachelor 42 9%
Other 134 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 164 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 99 22%
Unspecified 51 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 2%
Other 28 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 830. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,050
of 13,614,000 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#318
of 25,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81
of 192,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#3
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,614,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.