↓ Skip to main content

Use of structured expert judgment to forecast invasions by bighead and silver carp in Lake Erie

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of structured expert judgment to forecast invasions by bighead and silver carp in Lake Erie
Published in
Conservation Biology, August 2014
DOI 10.1111/cobi.12369
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marion E. Wittmann, Roger M. Cooke, John D. Rothlisberger, Edward S. Rutherford, Hongyan Zhang, Doran M. Mason, David M. Lodge

Abstract

Identifying which nonindigenous species will become invasive and forecasting the damage they will cause is difficult and presents a significant problem for natural resource management. Often, the data or resources necessary for ecological risk assessment are incomplete or absent, leaving environmental decision makers ill equipped to effectively manage valuable natural resources. Structured expert judgment (SEJ) is a mathematical and performance-based method of eliciting, weighting, and aggregating expert judgments. In contrast to other methods of eliciting and aggregating expert judgments (where, for example, equal weights may be assigned to experts), SEJ weights each expert on the basis of his or her statistical accuracy and informativeness through performance measurement on a set of calibration variables. We used SEJ to forecast impacts of nonindigenous Asian carp (Hypophthalmichthys spp.) in Lake Erie, where it is believed not to be established. Experts quantified Asian carp biomass, production, and consumption and their impact on 4 fish species if Asian carp were to become established. According to experts, in Lake Erie Asian carp have the potential to achieve biomass levels that are similar to the sum of biomasses for several fishes that are harvested commercially or recreationally. However, the impact of Asian carp on the biomass of these fishes was estimated by experts to be small, relative to long term average biomasses, with little uncertainty. Impacts of Asian carp in tributaries and on recreational activities, water quality, or other species were not addressed. SEJ can be used to quantify key uncertainties of invasion biology and also provide a decision-support tool when the necessary information for natural resource management and policy is not available. El Uso de Juicio Experto Estructurado para Predecir Invasiones de Carpas Asiáticas en el Lago Erie.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Finland 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Unknown 77 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 25%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 30%
Environmental Science 22 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 20 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#595,099
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#334
of 3,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,987
of 231,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#13
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.