↓ Skip to main content

SciClone: Inferring Clonal Architecture and Tracking the Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Tumor Evolution

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
36 X users
patent
2 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
411 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
483 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SciClone: Inferring Clonal Architecture and Tracking the Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Tumor Evolution
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003665
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher A. Miller, Brian S. White, Nathan D. Dees, Malachi Griffith, John S. Welch, Obi L. Griffith, Ravi Vij, Michael H. Tomasson, Timothy A. Graubert, Matthew J. Walter, Matthew J. Ellis, William Schierding, John F. DiPersio, Timothy J. Ley, Elaine R. Mardis, Richard K. Wilson, Li Ding

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 483 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 2%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
China 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 445 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 119 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 112 23%
Student > Bachelor 38 8%
Student > Master 35 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 6%
Other 72 15%
Unknown 76 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 153 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 118 24%
Computer Science 50 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 9%
Mathematics 11 2%
Other 26 5%
Unknown 82 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,134,182
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#901
of 9,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,016
of 243,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#12
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.