↓ Skip to main content

A cross-sectional study of adolescent non-suicidal self-injury: support for a specific distress-function relationship

Overview of attention for article published in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A cross-sectional study of adolescent non-suicidal self-injury: support for a specific distress-function relationship
Published in
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1753-2000-8-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Zetterqvist, Lars-Gunnar Lundh, Carl Göran Svedin

Abstract

This study has investigated the specific relationship between childhood adversities, individual trauma symptoms and the functions of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). The aim was to examine whether different self-reported adverse experiences and trauma symptoms predict the need to engage in NSSI, either to regulate emotions or to communicate with and influence others.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 14%
Student > Master 27 14%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 44 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 83 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 9%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 50 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2016.
All research outputs
#13,917,593
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#412
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,422
of 230,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.