↓ Skip to main content

A cross-sectional study of adolescent non-suicidal self-injury: support for a specific distress-function relationship

Overview of attention for article published in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A cross-sectional study of adolescent non-suicidal self-injury: support for a specific distress-function relationship
Published in
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1753-2000-8-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Zetterqvist, Lars-Gunnar Lundh, Carl Göran Svedin

Abstract

This study has investigated the specific relationship between childhood adversities, individual trauma symptoms and the functions of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). The aim was to examine whether different self-reported adverse experiences and trauma symptoms predict the need to engage in NSSI, either to regulate emotions or to communicate with and influence others.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 121 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Student > Master 19 15%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 12%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 12 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 67 54%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 10%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 17 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2016.
All research outputs
#8,185,930
of 14,535,828 outputs
Outputs from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#277
of 460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,102
of 194,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,535,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.