You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficacy of a web- and text messaging-based intervention to reduce problem drinking in young people: study protocol of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-809 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Severin Haug, Tobias Kowatsch, Raquel Paz Castro, Andreas Filler, Michael P Schaub |
Abstract |
Problem drinking, particularly risky single-occasion drinking is widespread among adolescents and young adults in most Western countries. Mobile phone text messaging allows a proactive and cost-effective delivery of short messages at any time and place and allows the delivery of individualised information at times when young people typically drink alcohol. The main objective of the planned study is to test the efficacy of a combined web- and text messaging-based intervention to reduce problem drinking in young people with heterogeneous educational level. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 60% |
Comoros | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
Unknown | 173 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 28 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 15% |
Student > Master | 25 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
Lecturer | 7 | 4% |
Other | 26 | 15% |
Unknown | 45 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 42 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 7% |
Computer Science | 7 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 11% |
Unknown | 51 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2014.
All research outputs
#13,410,980
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,521
of 14,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,582
of 230,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#171
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.