You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Participants in an online weight loss program can improve diet quality during weight loss: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-13-82 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate M O’Brien, Melinda J Hutchesson, Megan Jensen, Philip Morgan, Robin Callister, Clare E Collins |
| Abstract |
Better diet quality has been associated with less weight gain over time. However, few studies have examined the role of diet quality during weight loss. This study aimed to compare changes in diet quality in overweight/obese adults during a weight loss intervention, and determine whether an association between diet quality score and weight loss exists. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Belgium | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 167 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 20% |
| Unknown | 42 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 17% |
| Psychology | 19 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 46 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2021.
All research outputs
#497,843
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#150
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,083
of 230,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.