↓ Skip to main content

Surgery for weight loss in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
711 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
849 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgery for weight loss in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003641.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill L Colquitt, Karen Pickett, Emma Loveman, Geoff K Frampton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 849 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 830 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 159 19%
Student > Bachelor 133 16%
Researcher 90 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 75 9%
Other 209 25%
Unknown 94 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 456 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 72 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 4%
Psychology 26 3%
Social Sciences 24 3%
Other 87 10%
Unknown 147 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2019.
All research outputs
#284,679
of 14,173,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#723
of 10,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,530
of 194,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,173,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.