↓ Skip to main content

How do adults with physical disability experience primary care? A nationwide cross-sectional survey of access among patients in England

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How do adults with physical disability experience primary care? A nationwide cross-sectional survey of access among patients in England
Published in
BMJ Open, August 2014
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004714
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola T A Popplewell, Boika P D Rechel, Gary A Abel

Abstract

Almost a quarter of adults in England report a longstanding condition limiting physical activities. However, recent overseas evidence suggests poorer access to healthcare for disabled people. This study aimed to compare patient-reported access to English primary care for adults with and without physical disability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 104 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 15%
Social Sciences 15 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 28 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2014.
All research outputs
#13,751,991
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#14,751
of 23,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,428
of 231,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#167
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.