↓ Skip to main content

Identifying determinants of care for tailoring implementation in chronic diseases: an evaluation of different methods

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying determinants of care for tailoring implementation in chronic diseases: an evaluation of different methods
Published in
Implementation Science, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13012-014-0102-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Krause, Jan Van Lieshout, Rien Klomp, Elke Huntink, Eivind Aakhus, Signe Flottorp, Cornelia Jaeger, Jost Steinhaeuser, Maciek Godycki-Cwirko, Anna Kowalczyk, Shona Agarwal, Michel Wensing, Richard Baker

Abstract

The tailoring of implementation interventions includes the identification of the determinants of, or barriers to, healthcare practice. Different methods for identifying determinants have been used in implementation projects, but which methods are most appropriate to use is unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 145 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 16%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Psychology 16 11%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 31 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,672,390
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#858
of 1,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,763
of 238,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#13
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.