↓ Skip to main content

Change in health status in long-term conditions over a one year period: a cohort survey using patient-reported outcome measures

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Change in health status in long-term conditions over a one year period: a cohort survey using patient-reported outcome measures
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12955-014-0123-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michele Peters, Helen Crocker, Sarah Dummett, Crispin Jenkinson, Helen Doll, Ray Fitzpatrick

Abstract

Enhancing quality of life for people with long-term conditions by monitoring patient-reported outcome measure scores is a key domain of health care policy. This study investigated the responsiveness of patient-reported outcome measures for long-term conditions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 27%
Researcher 14 18%
Unspecified 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 20%
Unspecified 15 19%
Psychology 5 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 12 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2015.
All research outputs
#2,017,474
of 5,168,589 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#168
of 666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,286
of 130,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,168,589 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 60th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 666 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.