You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Steroids for improving recovery following tonsillectomy in children
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003997.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David L Steward, Jedidiah Grisel, Jareen Meinzen‐Derr |
Abstract |
This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 1, 2003.Tonsillectomy continues to be one of the most common surgical procedures performed worldwide. Despite advances in anesthetic and surgical techniques, post-tonsillectomy morbidity remains a significant clinical problem. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nepal | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 179 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
Other | 17 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 8% |
Researcher | 13 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
Other | 37 | 20% |
Unknown | 64 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
Psychology | 6 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 8% |
Unknown | 72 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,870,286
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,187
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,498
of 132,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.