↓ Skip to main content

Establishing endangered species recovery criteria using predictive simulation modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Establishing endangered species recovery criteria using predictive simulation modeling
Published in
Biological Conservation, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.018
Authors

Conor P. McGowan, Daniel H. Catlin, Terry L. Shaffer, Cheri L. Gratto-Trevor, Carol Aron

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Germany 1 2%
France 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 52 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 22%
Researcher 11 18%
Other 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 52%
Environmental Science 8 13%
Philosophy 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,421,420
of 13,635,031 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,963
of 4,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,702
of 193,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#30
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,635,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.