↓ Skip to main content

Group-based parent training programmes for improving parental psychosocial health

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
393 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Group-based parent training programmes for improving parental psychosocial health
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002020.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Barlow, Nadja Smailagic, Nick Huband, Verena Roloff, Cathy Bennett

Abstract

Parental psychosocial health can have a significant effect on the parent-child relationship, with consequences for the later psychological health of the child. Parenting programmes have been shown to have an impact on the emotional and behavioural adjustment of children, but there have been no reviews to date of their impact on parental psychosocial wellbeing.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 393 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 386 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 97 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 16%
Researcher 54 14%
Student > Bachelor 34 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 8%
Other 67 17%
Unknown 47 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 107 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 80 20%
Social Sciences 60 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 32 8%
Unknown 57 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,026,077
of 15,449,150 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,883
of 11,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,902
of 195,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,449,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.