You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philippa Davies, Anne E Walker, Jeremy M Grimshaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 792 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 1% |
| Canada | 8 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 761 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 139 | 18% |
| Researcher | 127 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 127 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 53 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 5% |
| Other | 158 | 20% |
| Unknown | 147 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 163 | 21% |
| Psychology | 108 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 101 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 91 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 20 | 3% |
| Other | 120 | 15% |
| Unknown | 189 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,189
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,531
of 179,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.