↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
256 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
505 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations
Published in
Implementation Science, February 2010
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-5-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippa Davies, Anne E Walker, Jeremy M Grimshaw

Abstract

There is growing interest in the use of cognitive, behavioural, and organisational theories in implementation research. However, the extent of use of theory in implementation research is uncertain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 505 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 11 2%
Canada 8 2%
United States 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 473 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 19%
Researcher 93 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 8%
Other 28 6%
Other 113 22%
Unknown 43 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 126 25%
Psychology 79 16%
Social Sciences 78 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 2%
Other 79 16%
Unknown 74 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,816,654
of 12,048,208 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#555
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,753
of 202,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#12
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,048,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.