↓ Skip to main content

Methods of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methods of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009060.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Myura Nagendran, Clare D Toon, Gian Piero Guerrini, Murat Zinnuroglu, Brian R Davidson

Abstract

Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation may decrease pain in people undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, the optimal method to administer the local anaesthetic is unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
Unknown 70 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Researcher 11 15%
Unspecified 9 12%
Other 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Other 25 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 55%
Unspecified 14 19%
Psychology 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 7 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2014.
All research outputs
#10,024,024
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,612
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,567
of 193,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#184
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.