You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Examining the use of evidence-based and social media supported tools in freely accessible physical activity intervention websites
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12966-014-0105-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Corneel Vandelanotte, Morwenna Kirwan, Amanda Rebar, Stephanie Alley, Camille Short, Luke Fallon, Gavin Buzza, Stephanie Schoeppe, Carol Maher, Mitch J Duncan |
| Abstract |
It has been shown that physical activity is more likely to increase if web-based interventions apply evidence-based components (e.g. self-monitoring) and incorporate interactive social media applications (e.g. social networking), but it is unclear to what extent these are being utilized in the publicly available web-based physical activity interventions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether freely accessible websites delivering physical activity interventions use evidence-based behavior change techniques and provide social media applications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 19% |
| Australia | 4 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 51% |
| Scientists | 9 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 174 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 37 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 44 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2016.
All research outputs
#1,470,089
of 25,382,035 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#513
of 2,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,630
of 244,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#10
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.