↓ Skip to main content

Attribution of global glacier mass loss to anthropogenic and natural causes

Overview of attention for article published in Science, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
38 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
208 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
23 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Attribution of global glacier mass loss to anthropogenic and natural causes
Published in
Science, August 2014
DOI 10.1126/science.1254702
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ben Marzeion, J. Graham Cogley, Kristin Richter, David Parkes, Marzeion B, Cogley JG, Richter K, Parkes D

Abstract

The ongoing global glacier retreat is affecting human societies by causing sea-level rise, changing seasonal water availability, and increasing geohazards. Melting glaciers are an icon of anthropogenic climate change. However, glacier response times are typically decades or longer, which implies that the present-day glacier retreat is a mixed response to past and current natural climate variability and current anthropogenic forcing. Here, we show that only 25 ± 35% of the global glacier mass loss during the period from 1851 to 2010 is attributable to anthropogenic causes. Nevertheless, the anthropogenic signal is detectable with high confidence in glacier mass balance observations during 1991 to 2010, and the anthropogenic fraction of global glacier mass loss during that period has increased to 69 ± 24%.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 208 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Germany 4 2%
Chile 2 1%
Peru 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 168 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 24%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 40 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 109 56%
Environmental Science 43 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Unspecified 7 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 17 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 550. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2018.
All research outputs
#9,413
of 11,396,266 outputs
Outputs from Science
#445
of 52,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153
of 192,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#16
of 794 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,396,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 794 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.