↓ Skip to main content

Risk of Readmission and Emergency Surgery Following Nonoperative Management of Colonic Diverticulitis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Risk of Readmission and Emergency Surgery Following Nonoperative Management of Colonic Diverticulitis
Published in
Annals of Surgery, September 2014
DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000000870
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debbie Li, Charles de Mestral, Nancy N. Baxter, Robin S. McLeod, Rahim Moineddin, Andrew S. Wilton, Avery B. Nathens

Abstract

To characterize the clinical course of patients with diverticulitis after nonoperative management and determine factors associated with readmission and subsequent emergency surgery.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 22%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 71%
Unspecified 9 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2014.
All research outputs
#1,728,291
of 12,614,142 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#1,286
of 5,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,528
of 198,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#18
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,614,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.