↓ Skip to main content

Tailored interventions based on exhaled nitric oxide versus clinical symptoms for asthma in children and adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tailored interventions based on exhaled nitric oxide versus clinical symptoms for asthma in children and adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006340.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen L Petsky, Christopher J Cates, Albert Li, Jennifer A Kynaston, Cathy Turner, Anne B Chang

Abstract

The measurement of severity and control of asthma in both children and adults can be based on subjective or objective measures. It has been advocated that fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) can be used to monitor airway inflammation as it correlates with some markers of asthma. Interventions for asthma therapies have been traditionally based on symptoms and/or spirometry.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Tunisia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 72 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Other 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Other 24 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Psychology 4 5%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 5 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,148,240
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,423
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,552
of 199,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#112
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.