↓ Skip to main content

Facilitation of corticospinal excitability by virtual reality exercise following anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy volunteers and subacute stroke subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Facilitation of corticospinal excitability by virtual reality exercise following anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy volunteers and subacute stroke subjects
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-11-124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yeun Joon Kim, Jeonghun Ku, Sangwoo Cho, Hyun Jung Kim, Yun Kyung Cho, Teo Lim, Youn Joo Kang

Abstract

There is growing evidence that the combination of non-invasive brain stimulation and motor skill training is an effective new treatment option in neurorehabilitation. We investigated the beneficial effects of the application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with virtual reality (VR) motor training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 263 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 15%
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 76 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 42 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 9%
Psychology 23 9%
Computer Science 10 4%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 94 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,206,472
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#95
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,959
of 235,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.