You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pessaries (mechanical devices) for pelvic organ prolapse in women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004010.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carol Bugge, Elisabeth J Adams, Deepa Gopinath, Fiona Reid |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 153 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 11% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 42 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,859,213
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,519
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,881
of 205,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.