↓ Skip to main content

Pessaries (mechanical devices) for pelvic organ prolapse in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pessaries (mechanical devices) for pelvic organ prolapse in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004010.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol Bugge, Elisabeth J Adams, Deepa Gopinath, Fiona Reid

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
India 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 94 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 27%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 12%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 13 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,794,458
of 14,067,456 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,551
of 10,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,707
of 199,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#101
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,067,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.