↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Screening programmes for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborn infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
Summary Blogs Twitter Wikipedia Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening programmes for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborn infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004595.pub2
Pubmed ID
21901691
Authors

Damon Shorter, Timothy Hong, David A Osborn

Abstract

Uncorrected developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is associated with long term morbidity such as gait abnormalities, chronic pain and degenerative arthritis.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 193 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 19%
Student > Bachelor 29 15%
Student > Postgraduate 21 11%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 37 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 12%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 44 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,353,628
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,967
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,098
of 125,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.