↓ Skip to main content

Preoperative carbohydrate treatment for enhancing recovery after elective surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
13 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preoperative carbohydrate treatment for enhancing recovery after elective surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009161.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark D Smith, John McCall, Lindsay Plank, G Peter Herbison, Mattias Soop, Jonas Nygren

Abstract

Preoperative carbohydrate treatments have been widely adopted as part of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) or fast-track surgery protocols. Although fast-track surgery protocols have been widely investigated and have been shown to be associated with improved postoperative outcomes, some individual constituents of these protocols, including preoperative carbohydrate treatment, have not been subject to such robust analysis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 282 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 21%
Student > Bachelor 41 14%
Researcher 38 13%
Other 33 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 8%
Other 63 21%
Unknown 36 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 173 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 51 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#529,963
of 13,842,000 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,598
of 10,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,975
of 199,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,842,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.