↓ Skip to main content

Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000979.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paola Agostino, Alessandro Ugolini, Alessio Signori, Armando Silvestrini-Biavati, Jayne E Harrison, Philip Riley

Abstract

A posterior crossbite occurs when the top back teeth bite inside the bottom back teeth. When it affects one side of the mouth, the lower jaw may have to move to one side to allow the back teeth to meet together. Several treatments have been recommended to correct this problem. Some treatments widen the upper teeth while others are directed at treating the cause of the posterior crossbite (e.g. breathing problems or sucking habits). Most treatments have been used at each stage of dental development. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2001.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Unknown 203 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 13%
Unspecified 24 11%
Student > Postgraduate 22 10%
Researcher 22 10%
Other 65 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 143 68%
Unspecified 34 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 11 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2019.
All research outputs
#581,907
of 13,361,045 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,886
of 10,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,389
of 201,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,361,045 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.