↓ Skip to main content

Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
323 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
789 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags
Published in
BMC Microbiology, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-10-206
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gary D Wu, James D Lewis, Christian Hoffmann, Ying-Yu Chen, Rob Knight, Kyle Bittinger, Jennifer Hwang, Jun Chen, Ronald Berkowsky, Lisa Nessel, Hongzhe Li, Frederic D Bushman

Abstract

Intense interest centers on the role of the human gut microbiome in health and disease, but optimal methods for analysis are still under development. Here we present a study of methods for surveying bacterial communities in human feces using 454/Roche pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene tags. We analyzed fecal samples from 10 individuals and compared methods for storage, DNA purification and sequence acquisition. To assess reproducibility, we compared samples one cm apart on a single stool specimen for each individual. To analyze storage methods, we compared 1) immediate freezing at -80 degrees C, 2) storage on ice for 24 or 3) 48 hours. For DNA purification methods, we tested three commercial kits and bead beating in hot phenol. Variations due to the different methodologies were compared to variation among individuals using two approaches--one based on presence-absence information for bacterial taxa (unweighted UniFrac) and the other taking into account their relative abundance (weighted UniFrac). In the unweighted analysis relatively little variation was associated with the different analytical procedures, and variation between individuals predominated. In the weighted analysis considerable variation was associated with the purification methods. Particularly notable was improved recovery of Firmicutes sequences using the hot phenol method. We also carried out surveys of the effects of different 454 sequencing methods (FLX versus Titanium) and amplification of different 16S rRNA variable gene segments. Based on our findings we present recommendations for protocols to collect, process and sequence bacterial 16S rDNA from fecal samples--some major points are 1) if feasible, bead-beating in hot phenol or use of the PSP kit improves recovery; 2) storage methods can be adjusted based on experimental convenience; 3) unweighted (presence-absence) comparisons are less affected by lysis method.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 789 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 25 3%
United Kingdom 8 1%
Belgium 4 <1%
Denmark 4 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
India 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Other 22 3%
Unknown 709 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 212 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 182 23%
Student > Master 86 11%
Student > Bachelor 55 7%
Other 41 5%
Other 142 18%
Unknown 71 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 401 51%
Medicine and Dentistry 84 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 72 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 42 5%
Environmental Science 26 3%
Other 64 8%
Unknown 100 13%