↓ Skip to main content

Shape information from glucose curves: Functional data analysis compared with traditional summary measures

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shape information from glucose curves: Functional data analysis compared with traditional summary measures
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-13-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathrine Frey Frøslie, Jo Røislien, Elisabeth Qvigstad, Kristin Godang, Jens Bollerslev, Nanna Voldner, Tore Henriksen, Marit B Veierød

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 79 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Professor 5 6%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 14%
Mathematics 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Computer Science 4 5%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2014.
All research outputs
#4,165,692
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#688
of 2,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,408
of 284,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.