↓ Skip to main content

Shape information from glucose curves: Functional data analysis compared with traditional summary measures

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shape information from glucose curves: Functional data analysis compared with traditional summary measures
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-13-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathrine Frey Frøslie, Jo Røislien, Elisabeth Qvigstad, Kristin Godang, Jens Bollerslev, Nanna Voldner, Tore Henriksen, Marit B Veierød

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 68 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Master 13 18%
Professor 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 15%
Mathematics 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Computer Science 4 5%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 11 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2014.
All research outputs
#517,165
of 4,140,527 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#80
of 515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,656
of 106,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,140,527 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 515 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.