↓ Skip to main content

Does pre-ordering tests enhance the value of the periodic examination? Study Design - Process implementation with retrospective chart review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does pre-ordering tests enhance the value of the periodic examination? Study Design - Process implementation with retrospective chart review
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-11-216
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vicki L Hunt, Rajeev Chaudhry, Robert J Stroebel, Frederick North

Abstract

To evaluate the value of a pre-ordering process for the pro-active scheduling and completion of appropriate preventive and chronic disease monitoring tests prior to a periodic health examination (PHE).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 18%
Psychology 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2011.
All research outputs
#18,295,723
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,422
of 7,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,869
of 126,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#74
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.