↓ Skip to main content

Allergen sensitization linked to climate and age, not to intermittent‐persistent rhinitis in a cross‐sectional cohort study in the (sub)tropics

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Allergen sensitization linked to climate and age, not to intermittent‐persistent rhinitis in a cross‐sectional cohort study in the (sub)tropics
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/2045-7022-4-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Désirée Larenas‐Linnemann, Alexandra Michels, Hanna Dinger, Kijawasch Shah‐Hosseini, Ralph Mösges, Alfredo Arias‐Cruz, Marichuy Ambriz‐Moreno, Martín Bedolla Barajas, Ruth Cerino Javier, María Prado, Manuel Alejandro Cruz Moreno, Roberto García Almaráz, Cecilia Y García‐Cobas, Daniel A Garcia Imperial, Rosa Garcia Muñoz, Dante Hernández‐Colín, Francisco J Linares‐Zapien, Jorge A Luna‐Pech, Juan J Matta‐Campos, Norma Martinez Jiménez, Miguel A Medina‐Ávalos, Alejandra Medina Hernández, Alberto Monteverde Maldonado, Doris N López, Luis J Pizano Nazara, Emmanuel Ramirez Sanchez, José D Ramos‐López, Noel Rodríguez‐Pérez, Pablo G Rodríguez‐Ortiz

Abstract

Allergen exposure leads to allergen sensitization in susceptible individuals and this might influence allergic rhinitis (AR) phenotype expression. We investigated whether sensitization patterns vary in a country with subtropical and tropical regions and if sensitization patterns relate to AR phenotypes or age.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 17%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 9 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2014.
All research outputs
#9,941,823
of 17,039,068 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#373
of 508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,209
of 205,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,039,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them