↓ Skip to main content

Allergen sensitization linked to climate and age, not to intermittent-persistent rhinitis in a cross-sectional cohort study in the (sub)tropics

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Allergen sensitization linked to climate and age, not to intermittent-persistent rhinitis in a cross-sectional cohort study in the (sub)tropics
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/2045-7022-4-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Désirée Larenas-Linnemann, Alexandra Michels, Hanna Dinger, Kijawasch Shah-Hosseini, Ralph Mösges, Alfredo Arias-Cruz, Marichuy Ambriz-Moreno, Martín Bedolla Barajas, Ruth Cerino Javier, María de la Luz Cid del Prado, Manuel Alejandro Cruz Moreno, Roberto García Almaráz, Cecilia Y García-Cobas, Daniel A Garcia Imperial, Rosa Garcia Muñoz, Dante Hernández-Colín, Francisco J Linares-Zapien, Jorge A Luna-Pech, Juan J Matta-Campos, Norma Martinez Jiménez, Miguel A Medina-Ávalos, Alejandra Medina Hernández, Alberto Monteverde Maldonado, Doris N López, Luis J Pizano Nazara, Emmanuel Ramirez Sanchez, José D Ramos-López, Noel Rodríguez-Pérez, Pablo G Rodríguez-Ortiz

Abstract

Allergen exposure leads to allergen sensitization in susceptible individuals and this might influence allergic rhinitis (AR) phenotype expression. We investigated whether sensitization patterns vary in a country with subtropical and tropical regions and if sensitization patterns relate to AR phenotypes or age.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 18%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 8 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2014.
All research outputs
#2,198,399
of 6,269,198 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#136
of 245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,573
of 140,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,269,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.