You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and evaluation of a treatment fidelity instrument for family‐based treatment of adolescent anorexia nervosa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Eating Disorders, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/eat.22337 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Forsberg, Kathleen Kara Fitzpatrick, Alison Darcy, Vandana Aspen, Erin C. Accurso, Susan W. Bryson, Stewart Agras, Katherine D. Arnow, Daniel Le Grange, James Lock |
| Abstract |
This study provides data on the psychometric properties of a newly developed measure of treatment fidelity in Family-Based Treatment (FBT) for adolescent anorexia nervosa (AN). The Family Therapy Fidelity and Adherence Check (FBT-FACT) was created to evaluate therapist adherence and competency on the core interventions in FBT. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 24% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 42 | 39% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2015.
All research outputs
#14,404,999
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Eating Disorders
#1,989
of 2,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,275
of 240,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Eating Disorders
#22
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.