↓ Skip to main content

ANTIDotE: anti-tick vaccines to prevent tick-borne diseases in Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ANTIDotE: anti-tick vaccines to prevent tick-borne diseases in Europe
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-7-77
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hein Sprong, Jos Trentelman, Ingar Seemann, Libor Grubhoffer, Ryan OM Rego, Ondřej Hajdušek, Petr Kopáček, Radek Šíma, Ard M Nijhof, Juan Anguita, Peter Winter, Bjorn Rotter, Sabina Havlíková, Boris Klempa, Theo P Schetters, Joppe WR Hovius

Abstract

Ixodes ricinus transmits bacterial, protozoal and viral pathogens, causing disease and forming an increasing health concern in Europe. ANTIDotE is an European Commission funded consortium of seven institutes, which aims to identify and characterize tick proteins involved in feeding and pathogen transmission. The knowledge gained will be used to develop and evaluate anti-tick vaccines that may prevent multiple human tick-borne diseases. Strategies encompassing anti-tick vaccines to prevent transmission of pathogens to humans, animals or wildlife will be developed with relevant stakeholders with the ultimate aim of reducing the incidence of tick-borne diseases in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 105 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Professor 11 10%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 23 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,387,754
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#433
of 5,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,731
of 239,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#5
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.