↓ Skip to main content

IV Diretriz Brasileira sobre Dislipidemias e Prevenção da Aterosclerose: Departamento de Aterosclerose da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 475)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
337 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IV Diretriz Brasileira sobre Dislipidemias e Prevenção da Aterosclerose: Departamento de Aterosclerose da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, April 2007
DOI 10.1590/s0066-782x2007000700002
Authors

Andrei C. Sposito, Bruno Caramelli, Francisco A. H. Fonseca, Marcelo C. Bertolami, Abrahão Afiune Neto, Aguinaldo David Souza, Ana Maria Pitta Lottenberg, Ana Paula Chacra, André A. Faludi, Andréia A. Loures-Vale, Antônio Carlos Carvalho, Bruce Duncan, Bruno Gelonese, Carisi Polanczyk, Carlos Roberto M. Rodrigues Sobrinho, Carlos Scherr, Cynthia Karla, Dikran Armaganijan, Emílio Moriguchi, Francisco Saraiva, Geraldo Pichetti, Hermes Toros Xavier, Hilton Chaves, Jairo Lins Borges, Jayme Diament, Jorge Ilha Guimarães, José Carlos Nicolau, José Ernesto dos Santos, José Jayme Galvão de Lima, José Luiz Vieira, José Paulo Novazzi, José Rocha Faria Neto, Kerginaldo P. Torres, Leonor de Almeida Pinto, Liliana Bricarello, Luiz Carlos Bodanese, Luiz Introcaso, Marcus Vinícius Bolívar Malachias, Maria Cristina Izar, Maria Eliane C. Magalhães, Maria Inês Schmidt, Mariléia Scartezini, Moacir Nobre, Murilo Foppa, Neusa A. Forti, Otávio Berwanger, Otávio C. E. Gebara, Otávio Rizzi Coelho, Raul C. Maranhão, Raul Dias dos Santos Fº, Rosana Perim Costa, Sandhi Barreto, Sérgio Kaiser, Silvia Ihara, Tales de Carvalho, Tania Leme Rocha Martinez, Waldir Gabriel Miranda Relvas, Wilson Salgado

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 4%
Unknown 82 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 21%
Professor 12 14%
Student > Postgraduate 9 11%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 24 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,511,550
of 12,656,473 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#11
of 475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,547
of 91,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,656,473 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 475 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them