↓ Skip to main content

GCS as a predictor of mortality in patients with traumatic inferior vena cava injuries: a retrospective review of 16 cases

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Emergency Surgery, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GCS as a predictor of mortality in patients with traumatic inferior vena cava injuries: a retrospective review of 16 cases
Published in
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1749-7922-8-59
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Cudworth, Angelo Fulle, Juan P Ramos, Ivette Arriagada

Abstract

Recent research has determined Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) to be an independent predictor of mortality in patients with traumatic inferior vena cava (IVC) injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of GCS, as well as other factors previously described as determinants of mortality, in a cohort of patients presenting with traumatic IVC lesions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Other 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 63%
Unspecified 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2014.
All research outputs
#20,234,388
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#469
of 543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,402
of 305,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.