↓ Skip to main content

Recovery of neurocognitive functions following sustained abstinence after substance dependence and implications for treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Psychology Review
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recovery of neurocognitive functions following sustained abstinence after substance dependence and implications for treatment
Published in
Clinical Psychology Review
DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.08.002
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Substance Use Disorders (SUDs) have been associated with impaired neurocognitive functioning, which may (partly) improve with sustained abstinence. New treatments are emerging, aimed at improving cognitive functions, and being tested. However, no integrated review is available regarding neurocognitive recovery following sustained abstinence.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 98 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 18 17%
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 25 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 53%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Neuroscience 9 9%
Unspecified 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 9 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2014.
All research outputs
#5,135,618
of 9,723,038 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychology Review
#854
of 975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,352
of 190,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychology Review
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,723,038 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.