↓ Skip to main content

Advanced trauma life support training for hospital staff

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
44 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advanced trauma life support training for hospital staff
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004173.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sudha Jayaraman, Dinesh Sethi, Paul Chinnock, Roger Wong

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 134 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 18%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 33 23%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 13%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 26 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2019.
All research outputs
#498,752
of 14,798,224 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,388
of 11,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,816
of 199,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,798,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.