↓ Skip to main content

Effect of a Family-Centered, Secondhand Smoke Intervention to Reduce Respiratory Illness in Indigenous Infants in Australia and New Zealand: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Nicotine & Tobacco Research, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of a Family-Centered, Secondhand Smoke Intervention to Reduce Respiratory Illness in Indigenous Infants in Australia and New Zealand: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Nicotine & Tobacco Research, August 2014
DOI 10.1093/ntr/ntu128
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Walker, V. Johnston, M. Glover, C. Bullen, A. Trenholme, A. Chang, P. Morris, C. Segan, N. Brown, D. Fenton, E. Hawthorne, R. Borland, V. Parag, T. Von Blaramberg, D. Westphal, D. Thomas

Abstract

Secondhand smoke (SHS) is a significant cause of acute respiratory illness (ARI) and 5 times more common in indigenous children. A single-blind randomized trial was undertaken to determine the efficacy of a family centered SHS intervention to reduce ARI in indigenous infants in Australia and New Zealand.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 153 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 29 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 17%
Psychology 17 11%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 38 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,821,254
of 17,788,816 outputs
Outputs from Nicotine & Tobacco Research
#544
of 2,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,882
of 208,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nicotine & Tobacco Research
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,788,816 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.