↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Social Media Responses to the Annals of Emergency Medicine Residents' Perspective Article on Multiple Mini-Interviews

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Emergency Medicine, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Peer reviews Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social Media Responses to the Annals of Emergency Medicine Residents' Perspective Article on Multiple Mini-Interviews
Published in
Annals of Emergency Medicine, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.07.024
Pubmed ID
25149965
Authors

Nikita K. Joshi, Lalena M. Yarris, Christopher I. Doty, Michelle Lin

Abstract

In May 2014, Annals of Emergency Medicine continued a successful collaboration with an academic Web site, Academic Life in Emergency Medicine (ALiEM) to host an online discussion session featuring the 2014 Annals Residents' Perspective article "Does the Multiple Mini-Interview Address Stakeholder Needs? An Applicant's Perspective" by Phillips and Garmel. This dialogue included Twitter conversations, a live videocast with the authors and other experts, and detailed discussions on the ALiEM Web site's comment section. This summary article serves the dual purpose of reporting the qualitative thematic analysis from a global online discussion and the Web analytics for our novel multimodal approach. Social media technologies provide a unique opportunity to engage with a diverse audience to detect existing and new emerging themes. Such technologies allow rapid hypothesis generation for future research and enable more accelerated knowledge translation.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Turkey 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Master 10 17%
Researcher 7 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 17 28%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 38%
Computer Science 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 7%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 8 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,201,469
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#3,470
of 6,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,726
of 237,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#45
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.