↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Self-monitoring and Medication Self-titration on Systolic Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients at High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
201 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Effect of Self-monitoring and Medication Self-titration on Systolic Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients at High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2014
DOI 10.1001/jama.2014.10057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard J. McManus, Jonathan Mant, M. Sayeed Haque, Emma P. Bray, Stirling Bryan, Sheila M. Greenfield, Miren I. Jones, Sue Jowett, Paul Little, Cristina Penaloza, Claire Schwartz, Helen Shackleford, Claire Shovelton, Jinu Varghese, Bryan Williams, F.D. Richard Hobbs

Abstract

Self-monitoring of blood pressure with self-titration of antihypertensives (self-management) results in lower blood pressure in patients with hypertension, but there are no data about patients in high-risk groups.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 134 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
United States 3 1%
Austria 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 253 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 15%
Student > Master 40 15%
Other 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Other 72 27%
Unknown 18 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 153 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 8%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Psychology 11 4%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 36 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 205. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#82,936
of 15,330,882 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#1,636
of 27,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,073
of 201,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#22
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,330,882 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.