↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Self-monitoring and Medication Self-titration on Systolic Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients at High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Self-monitoring and Medication Self-titration on Systolic Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients at High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2014
DOI 10.1001/jama.2014.10057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard J. McManus, Jonathan Mant, M. Sayeed Haque, Emma P. Bray, Stirling Bryan, Sheila M. Greenfield, Miren I. Jones, Sue Jowett, Paul Little, Cristina Penaloza, Claire Schwartz, Helen Shackleford, Claire Shovelton, Jinu Varghese, Bryan Williams, F.D. Richard Hobbs

Abstract

Self-monitoring of blood pressure with self-titration of antihypertensives (self-management) results in lower blood pressure in patients with hypertension, but there are no data about patients in high-risk groups.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 135 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
United States 3 1%
Austria 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 265 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 53 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 15%
Student > Master 41 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Other 24 8%
Other 77 27%
Unknown 21 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 156 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 8%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Psychology 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 39 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 206. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#87,449
of 15,816,192 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#1,727
of 28,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,081
of 202,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#22
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,816,192 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.