Title |
Effect of Self-monitoring and Medication Self-titration on Systolic Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients at High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: The TASMIN-SR Randomized Clinical Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1001/jama.2014.10057 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Richard J McManus, Jonathan Mant, M Sayeed Haque, Emma P Bray, Stirling Bryan, Sheila M Greenfield, Miren I Jones, Sue Jowett, Paul Little, Cristina Penaloza, Claire Schwartz, Helen Shackleford, Claire Shovelton, Jinu Varghese, Bryan Williams, F D Richard Hobbs, Trevor Gooding, Ian Morrey, Crispin Fisher, David Buckley |
Abstract |
Self-monitoring of blood pressure with self-titration of antihypertensives (self-management) results in lower blood pressure in patients with hypertension, but there are no data about patients in high-risk groups. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 29 | 23% |
United States | 29 | 23% |
Canada | 4 | 3% |
France | 3 | 2% |
Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
Argentina | 3 | 2% |
Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Unknown | 41 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 78 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 19% |
Scientists | 19 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 456 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
United States | 3 | <1% |
Austria | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Thailand | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | <1% |
Unknown | 438 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 69 | 15% |
Student > Master | 60 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 37 | 8% |
Other | 33 | 7% |
Other | 104 | 23% |
Unknown | 102 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 203 | 45% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 8% |
Psychology | 16 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 3% |
Other | 48 | 11% |
Unknown | 125 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 197. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#201,435
of 25,398,331 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#2,815
of 36,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,638
of 247,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#22
of 380 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,398,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 380 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.