↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Self-monitoring and Medication Self-titration on Systolic Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients at High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: The TASMIN-SR Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
334 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
456 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Effect of Self-monitoring and Medication Self-titration on Systolic Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients at High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: The TASMIN-SR Randomized Clinical Trial
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2014
DOI 10.1001/jama.2014.10057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard J McManus, Jonathan Mant, M Sayeed Haque, Emma P Bray, Stirling Bryan, Sheila M Greenfield, Miren I Jones, Sue Jowett, Paul Little, Cristina Penaloza, Claire Schwartz, Helen Shackleford, Claire Shovelton, Jinu Varghese, Bryan Williams, F D Richard Hobbs, Trevor Gooding, Ian Morrey, Crispin Fisher, David Buckley

Abstract

Self-monitoring of blood pressure with self-titration of antihypertensives (self-management) results in lower blood pressure in patients with hypertension, but there are no data about patients in high-risk groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 456 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 438 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 69 15%
Student > Master 60 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 11%
Student > Bachelor 37 8%
Other 33 7%
Other 104 23%
Unknown 102 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 203 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 8%
Psychology 16 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Social Sciences 14 3%
Other 48 11%
Unknown 125 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 197. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#201,435
of 25,398,331 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#2,815
of 36,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,638
of 247,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#22
of 380 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,398,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 380 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.