↓ Skip to main content

A meta-analysis of variables that predict significant intracranial injury in minor head trauma

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Disease in Childhood, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A meta-analysis of variables that predict significant intracranial injury in minor head trauma
Published in
Archives of Disease in Childhood, July 2004
DOI 10.1136/adc.2003.027722
Pubmed ID
Authors

J Dunning

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 98 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Student > Master 10 10%
Other 24 24%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 57%
Psychology 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Neuroscience 7 7%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 15 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#7,540,093
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood
#3,198
of 7,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,801
of 54,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.