↓ Skip to main content

Do cities simulate climate change? A comparison of herbivore response to urban and global warming

Overview of attention for article published in Global Change Biology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do cities simulate climate change? A comparison of herbivore response to urban and global warming
Published in
Global Change Biology, August 2014
DOI 10.1111/gcb.12692
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elsa Youngsteadt, Adam G. Dale, Adam J. Terando, Robert R. Dunn, Steven D. Frank

Abstract

Cities experience elevated temperature, CO2 , and nitrogen deposition decades ahead of the global average, such that biological response to urbanization may predict response to future climate change. This hypothesis remains untested due to a lack of complementary urban and long-term observations. Here, we examine the response of an herbivore, the scale insect Melanaspis tenebricosa, to temperature in the context of an urban heat island, a series of historical temperature fluctuations, and recent climate warming. We survey M. tenebricosa on 55 urban street trees in Raleigh, NC, 342 herbarium specimens collected in the rural southeastern United States from 1895 to 2011, and at 20 rural forest sites represented by both modern (2013) and historical samples. We relate scale insect abundance to August temperatures and find that M. tenebricosa is most common in the hottest parts of the city, on historical specimens collected during warm time periods, and in present-day rural forests compared to the same sites when they were cooler. Scale insects reached their highest densities in the city, but abundance peaked at similar temperatures in urban and historical datasets and tracked temperature on a decadal scale. Although urban habitats are highly modified, species response to a key abiotic factor, temperature, was consistent across urban and rural-forest ecosystems. Cities may be an appropriate but underused system for developing and testing hypotheses about biological effects of climate change. Future work should test the applicability of this model to other groups of organisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 233 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 21%
Researcher 50 20%
Student > Master 37 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 33 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 115 47%
Environmental Science 59 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 4%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Chemistry 3 1%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 42 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2018.
All research outputs
#547,930
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#652
of 6,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,071
of 250,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#6
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.