You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Screening of DUB activity and specificity by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms5763 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Stella Ritorto, Richard Ewan, Ana B. Perez-Oliva, Axel Knebel, Sara J. Buhrlage, Melanie Wightman, Sharon M. Kelly, Nicola T. Wood, Satpal Virdee, Nathanael S. Gray, Nicholas A. Morrice, Dario R. Alessi, Matthias Trost |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 40% |
| Sweden | 1 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Madagascar | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 271 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 93 | 33% |
| Researcher | 56 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Unknown | 52 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 89 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 23% |
| Chemistry | 36 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 2% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Unknown | 56 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2017.
All research outputs
#5,546,510
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#39,648
of 58,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,160
of 249,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#377
of 662 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 662 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.