↓ Skip to main content

Integrated collaborative care for comorbid major depression in patients with cancer (SMaRT Oncology-2): a multicentre randomised controlled effectiveness trial.

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
47 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrated collaborative care for comorbid major depression in patients with cancer (SMaRT Oncology-2): a multicentre randomised controlled effectiveness trial.
Published in
The Lancet, August 2014
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61231-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Sharpe, Jane Walker, Christian Holm Hansen, Paul Martin, Stefan Symeonides, Charlie Gourley, Lucy Wall, David Weller, Gordon Murray

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Master 10 16%
Researcher 9 14%
Other 8 13%
Unspecified 6 9%
Other 20 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 31%
Psychology 14 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Unspecified 7 11%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Other 12 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2017.
All research outputs
#60,693
of 11,465,445 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#923
of 29,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,215
of 194,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#27
of 376 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,465,445 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 376 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.