↓ Skip to main content

Confocal microscopy as a useful approach to describe gill rakers of Asian species of carp and native filter‐feeding fishes of the upper Mississippi River system

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Fish Biology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Confocal microscopy as a useful approach to describe gill rakers of Asian species of carp and native filter‐feeding fishes of the upper Mississippi River system
Published in
Journal of Fish Biology, August 2014
DOI 10.1111/jfb.12504
Pubmed ID
Authors

Walleser, L. R., Howard, D. R., Sandheinrich, M. B., Gaikowski, M. P., Amberg, J. J., Walleser LR, Howard DR, Sandheinrich MB, Gaikowski MP, Amberg JJ

Abstract

To better understand potential diet overlap among exotic Asian species of carp and native species of filter-feeding fishes of the upper Mississippi River system, microscopy was used to document morphological differences in the gill rakers. Analysing samples first with light microscopy and subsequently with confocal microscopy, the three-dimensional structure of gill rakers in Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, Hypophthalmichthys nobilis and Dorosoma cepedianum was more thoroughly described and illustrated than previous work with traditional microscopy techniques. The three-dimensional structure of gill rakers in Ictiobus cyprinellus was described and illustrated for the first time.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 45%
Student > Master 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 45%
Environmental Science 4 36%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 9%
Physics and Astronomy 1 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2014.
All research outputs
#4,726,166
of 6,395,526 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fish Biology
#819
of 1,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,238
of 155,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fish Biology
#33
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,395,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,195 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.