You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Analysis of operative efficacy for giant pituitary adenoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Surgery, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2482-14-59 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shousen Wang, Shun’an Lin, Liangfeng Wei, Lin Zhao, Yinxing Huang |
Abstract |
Surgical treatment of giant pituitary adenomas is difficult due to complicated dissection of the sellar area. The extent of tumor resection affects the efficacy of surgical treatment. This study is to investigate the efficacy of microsurgical treatment for giant pituitary adenoma and to analyze the relationship between treatment efficacy and tumor resection extent. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Russia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 36 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 19% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Other | 6 | 16% |
Unknown | 6 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 57% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2014.
All research outputs
#18,376,927
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#616
of 1,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,513
of 236,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,319 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.