You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hyperemesis gravidarum: current perspectives
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Women's Health, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijwh.s37685 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jennifer Lutomski, Fergus P McCarthy, Richard A Greene |
Abstract |
Hyperemesis gravidarum is a complex condition with a multifactorial etiology characterized by severe intractable nausea and vomiting. Despite a high prevalence, studies exploring underlying etiology and treatments are limited. We performed a literature review, focusing on articles published over the last 10 years, to examine current perspectives and recent developments in hyperemesis gravidarum. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 6 | 46% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
North Macedonia | 1 | 8% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | 8% |
Mexico | 1 | 8% |
Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 31% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 253 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 73 | 28% |
Student > Master | 25 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 7% |
Lecturer | 13 | 5% |
Researcher | 11 | 4% |
Other | 35 | 14% |
Unknown | 84 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 5% |
Unknown | 87 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#712,255
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#38
of 766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,513
of 229,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.