↓ Skip to main content

Relative influences of climate change and human activity on the onshore distribution of polar bears

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relative influences of climate change and human activity on the onshore distribution of polar bears
Published in
Biological Conservation, October 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.08.005
Authors

Ryan R. Wilson, Eric V. Regehr, Michelle St. Martin, Todd C. Atwood, Elizabeth Peacock, Susanne Miller, George Divoky

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 20%
Researcher 20 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Master 13 11%
Other 7 6%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 31%
Environmental Science 33 29%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Unspecified 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 26 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#12,146,754
of 19,741,505 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#4,875
of 5,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,015
of 289,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#85
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,741,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.